Abstract: A cable operator chooses to bundle or provide programs a la carte by striking a balance between the incentive to maximize total surplus and minimize transfer payments to program providers. Importantly, a cable operators decision to bundle or provide programs a la carte maximizes total producer surplus if the cable operators bargaining power is sufficiently high. However, a cable operator in a weak bargaining position might strategically choose to bundle or unbundle viewer channels in order to enhance its bargaining position with individual program suppliers, even when this decision reduces total surplus. Thus, it is plausible that regulations which cap the market share or impose a la carte on cable operators may reduce total surplus.